Our work with computer-assisted mass appraisal (CAMA) systems includes:

C Evaluations of in-place CAMA systems for the State of Arizona; Boulder County, Colorado; Brevard County, Florida; Cook County, Illinois; the City of Edmonton, Alberta; the Town of Greenwich, Connecticut; Kent County, Delaware; the State of Massachusetts; New Castle County, Delaware; Oklahoma County, Oklahoma; the Province of Saskatchewan; Sedgwick County, Kansas; the City of St. Albert, Alberta; Tulsa County, Oklahoma; the City of Winnipeg, Manitoba; Wyandotte County, Kansas; and the State of Wyoming

C Assistance with CAMA system procurement. This has included developing specifications and evaluating proposals. Clients we have served in one or both of these capacities include the State of Connecticut; Cook County, Illinois; the District of Columbia; Dona Ana County, New Mexico; the City of Edmonton, Alberta; Erie County, Pennsylvania; the State of Massachusetts; Peoria County, Illinois; the City of Portsmouth, New Hampshire; Shelby County (Memphis), Tennessee; the State of West Virginia; and the City of Winnipeg, Manitoba. These evaluations included comparisons of system functional capabilities, provisions for staff training and system support, and cost.

C Hands-on experience in CAMA system development and mass appraisal model building in the Republic of Armenia; the State of Arizona; Brevard County, Florida; The City of Calgary, Alberta; Cook County, Illinois; the City of Detroit, Michigan; Douglas County, Colorado; the City of Edmonton, Alberta; Jefferson County, Colorado; Johnson County, Kansas; Kent County, Delaware; Pima County (Tucson), Arizona; the Province of Ontario; Polk County, Iowa; Shelby County, Tennessee; the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago; Tulsa County, Oklahoma; the City of Two Rivers, Wisconsin; and the City of Winnipeg, Manitoba.